From the Book of Coming Up

I went to the Master and sat at his feet. 
   Then he said, "Verily I tell you, whosoever will provoke the Son of Man will himself be provoked.  Those who wish to come to the Father must kill me.  The guests will not be satisfied with an emissary, nor does one hold a key without opening the door. 
   Split a piece of wood and I am there, but what is there when you are split in two?
  
A prophecy

   A time is coming soon when the foundations of the West will shake and the ocean rise.  On that day the cry to heaven will be great and many will perish.  Some will say it is because of the sin of Eden; others will claim it is the end of all things.  Do not believe the things they say in the agonies of their terror.  Rather say, 'These things are the beginning of the unrest.  They are a sign.'  For this reason you must go tell the people of the West to flee their homes.  When they ask what way they should go say to them, 'To the Rising Sun.'"
   After the Master had said these things I asked him, "What are those things a sign of, and what is the coming unrest?"
   He replied, "They are a sign of the unrest itself, which is much greater than the sign.  All signs serve something greater.  So too, the destruction of the earth will point to a worse unrest.  This will not be something one can prepare for or avoid, and destruction will find them no matter how far they flee."
   After this he left me to wonder at his words and the coming time.

The birth of natural religion

There are many different religious traditions, and they all hold their beliefs regarding the universe, human creatures, the meaning of life, etc., to be more or less correct.

Many of these religious traditions are quite ancient. Even though they presume to be divinely guided, the recipients of revelation, witnesses of miracles, etc., the only evidence they have is the testimony of others, passed on from generation to generation, and anecdotal stories that seem to support their assumptions. 

What if starting today you choose to set aside the old traditions about deities and spirits, and look at the world with these beliefs bracketed or unassumed? Would the gods or God make an appearance at all? Without your former presuppositions, would you find even a hint of the old gods in the world around you? 

This is a challenge to those who have received their beliefs from others.  What do you see if you use your own eyes?

Colour Changing Card Trick

Little brown park mushroom

Photo: www.earnestlyseekingthereal.com

Another unidentified saprobe.  Ancaster, ON.  (Click on photo for larger image).

Little white mushroom

Photo: www.earnestlyseekingthereal.com

Unidentified saprophyte.  My guess is Mycena or Coprinoid.  Ancaster, ON.  (Click on photo for larger image).

Voyeuse

sighs and soft skin
wrapped afternoons
can i speak of satisfactions with you?
once claimed
once given
once turned aside by moral considerations
still lingering
your voice says it all
notions
unshakeable principles
strawmen reduced to chaff
by more natural inclinations
yet you're happy to be my confessor?
my speech moves something
inside you
lingering like a voyeuse
refusing nature with glances
head cocked twinkling eyes
you lick your lips
preferring ideas to
the real
(a religious rejection)

it will be too late
but not for regrets

Cardinalis cardinalis

Cardinalis cardinalis Photo: www.earnestlyseekingthereal.com

Northern Cardinal.  Ancaster, ON May 26, 2015 (click on photo for larger view).

Polysporus squamosus

Polysporus squamosus- Photo: www.earnestlyseekingthereal.com

Polysporus squamosus, or "Dryads Saddle."  Hamilton, Ontario, May 9, 2015.  (Click on photo for larger image).

Pluteus longistriatus

Pluteus longistriatus- Photo: www.earnestlyseekingthereal.com 

I've identified this as Pluteus longistriatus (is the dark ring around the base of the pileus common?).  Discovered in Hamilton, Ontario, May 19, 2015.  (Click on photo for larger version).

Against the Christian nihilist

Against the accusation that non-believers are inconsistent by enjoying life rather than despair that their lives are meaningless without God or an afterlife.

Recently a friend challenged me thus: "Do you not act inconsistently, or not understand the full implications of  atheism, when you fail to appreciate the import of a life that has no meaning, that will cease to be forever, whose works will all come to naught?  It seems to me that atheists should be a much more despairing group of people."

This, as I have mentioned elsewhere, is a very religious understanding of atheism.  It already takes God as its starting point, a ground from which to make comparisons.  For believers in God atheism is a negative, a subtraction.  For non-believers it is no such thing, for there is nothing to subtract their perspective from.  One must already have the existence of a God in order for his non-existence to draw the meaning of life away.  For this reason one should be careful to see through the supposed argument to its root, what the interrogator is really saying: "I can't imagine life without God.  My life would have no meaning without God, therefore yours shouldn't either."  But this says little more than for this one, God has meaning.  I can accept the first part of this argument, but not the second.  I find it strange that a Christian would try to convince me life is meaningless because I do not believe in eternal life or a deity.  In essence they are trying to convince me my hermeneutic of death is mistaken and that a proper atheist interpretation would see death as a meaning-vacuum, or a meaning-destroyer, and thus my life should consistently reflect the implications of this meaninglessness, i.e. I should hold a nihilistic attitude toward life.  Fundamentally then we see the idea of God simultaneously sets up the possibility of a thoroughgoing nihilism.

Regarding death, even a cursory glance at the writings of antiquity reveals alternative views to the one held by my skeptical friend.  For example, Lucretius: "Do you not know that in real death there will be no second you, living to lament your death and standing by your corpse?"  From Seneca: "Life itself is neither a good nor an evil: life is where good or evil find a place, depending on how you make it for them."  And from Montaigne (in the guise of Nature): "Truly imagine how much less bearable for Man, and how much more painful, would be a life which lasted for ever rather than the life which I have given you.  If you did not have death you would curse me, for ever, for depriving you of it."

Why must I view death in the morose and nihilistic way my friend was convinced I should see it?  Why not rather "eat and drink, for tomorrow we die" (St. Paul)?  What I know is that I live.  I have this life right before me.  My friend, however, does not have even this evidence in support of her beliefs and ideas.  If there is inconsistency, surely it lies with the notions of a God or eternal life, things that cannot be found anywhere in the world or nature, but merely as two of many ideas regarding supernatural matters. One might add, why are there not more Christians taking out full page ads in the paper, paying for multiple blocks of radio and television time, to warn people of eternal hell (no matter how the host of its cultured defenders would like to interpret it)?  Perhaps the charge of inconsistency could function here as a mirror into which my friend should gaze intently, and with care.

Ὁ θάνατος οὐδὲν πρὸς ἡμᾶς· τὸ γὰρ διαλυθὲν ἀναισθητεῖ· τὸ δ’ ἀναισθητοῦν οὐδὲν πρὸς ἡμᾶς

(Death is nothing to us.  For what has been dissolved feels nothing.  While what feels nothing is nothing to us.- Epicurus)

Vision

"Now when something is revealed to us we see it, and the response to this revelation is not faith in the unseen or hope in Divine promises but vision, seeing face to face after we have been seeing through a glass darkly. Vision is the end of religion, and the destruction of the physical universe is the clearing of our own eyesight."  Northrop Frye

Seeing

“What,” it will be Questioned, “When the Sun rises, do you not see a round Disk of fire somewhat like a Guinea?” O no no, I see an Innumerable company of the Heavenly host crying “Holy Holy Holy is the Lord God Almighty.” -Blake

what do you see
when this vast panoply
opens up before you?
guinea in the sun
host around the Son

there's a clue here
a key to the Real

Wind Song

Aphorisms 2

5

 

Our basic starting point is the world. Previously we have been told our basic starting point is something other than this. The world is all we know. We are born, grow, and decline within it. By “world” one might think I mean the planet Earth. While it is true I shall never leave it, the planet itself would not be possible without those forces and spaces that exist outside it, act upon it, and situate it. For this reason our spiritual orientation should not be narrowly focussed on the Earth, but the COSMOS. By “focussed on” I do not mean in any way to seize upon something, but rather to open oneself up to possibility. 

 

6

 

Everything we need comes from the world. All sustenance, joys, meaning, truths, all revelations and visions, have always come from the world. If this were not so we would not know it. Even the gods must use the voice of Nature to speak: in visions perceived by brains, words, rumblings, lights, plants, fire, or even swirling tea leaves. All belong to Nature. Without the world we hear nothing.

 

7

To perceive we must direct ourselves to the world. The world speaks to us in a multitude of ways. Some ways of perceiving are direct while others are indirect. To see an oak tree is a more direct perception than to hear a description of it from a friend. But to hear of an oak tree from a friend is more direct than to learn of a general category such as “tree” from a textbook or lecture. The particular vision of a thing is always preferred to an abstraction.

 

8

 

Ninety-nine percent of religious doctrine is abstraction.

 

 

Aphorisms

1

When we start with the question, “Is there a God?” we already presume too much. It’s as if an answer has been given before the question was even asked. On what basis do we ask the question? Where did this idea come from: God? It was offered to us. It didn’t come from ourselves. It was ready-made. Have we not grown weary of believing, without reflection, in the ready-made? 

2

Kant opened his famous essay on the Enlightenment with these words: “Aufklärung ist der Ausgang des Menschen aus seiner selbstverschuldeten Unmündigkeit” (Enlightenment is man’s emergence from his self-incurred immaturity). He continues: “Unmündigkeit ist das Unvermögen, sich seines Verstandes ohne Leitung eines anderen zu bedienen” (Immaturity is the inability to use one’s own understanding without the guidance of another). The religious, on the other hand, think that accepting the ready-made on faith is one of the greatest virtues: “Lean not on your own understanding, but trust in God with all your heart” (Proverbs 3:5). Religion is the antithesis of the Enlightenment i.e. the antithesis of human emergence.

3

The basic starting point of any spiritual investigation is human experience. To be even more clear: the basic starting point is individual experience. Neither my friend’s experience, nor the experience of a man living in the wilderness two thousand years ago teaches me anything about the shape my own experience should take. They are never prescriptive. At best they offer demonstrations of various possibilities. Even here these possibilities are often marked by some previous imposition of religious structure (which is by nature a delimitation).

4

The vast majority of religious adherents never have profound spiritual experiences. They go to mosque, synagogue, church, or temple and rehearse the same ritualistic motions day after day, week after week. This monotonous rehearsal often makes up the greatest part of religious life. The multitude is content to allow the true spiritual experience be the special privilege of the religious founder, the religious genius. They think he or she is exceptional by nature when in fact the religious genius has an exceptional will.